Head to head · Verified 2026-08-11
Kodus vs Sourcery
Kodus covers more of the baseline (6.5/9 vs 1.5/9), but the split matters more than the total. Everything below comes from each vendor's public documentation, mapped against the same 9 standards.
Kodus
AI PR Review
Open-source AI code review built to run where the organization controls: self-hosted or cloud, models under your keys, org-wide Kody Rules.
- Licence
- Open source
- Self-hosting
- Self-hostable
- From
- $10/dev/mo
Sourcery
AI PR Review
AI reviewer for GitHub and GitLab with line-by-line reviews, summaries and diagrams, custom rules, and BYO-LLM on its Team tier.
- Licence
- Proprietary
- Self-hosting
- Enterprise only
- From
- $12/seat/mo
The short answer
Across the 9 standards, Kodus is better documented on 8 (context depth, rule control, local and PR review, business-logic checks, learning from your team, sandbox validation, cost control and actionable fixes), Sourcery on 0 (none), and 1 come out even.
On deployment they are not interchangeable: Kodus is fully self-hostable on a standard plan, while Sourcery is self-hostable only on an enterprise contract. If code cannot leave your network, that single row decides the evaluation before anything else on this page.
Kodus publishes its source under AGPL-3.0 (dual-licensed; enterprise-marked files commercial); Sourcery is proprietary. That changes what you can audit, fork, and keep running if the vendor's terms change.
Pick Kodus if you care most about context depth, rule control and local and PR review, the reviewer has to run inside your own infrastructure and you want to read the source before you trust it.
Pick Sourcery if its documented coverage lines up with how your team already works.
Side by side
| Fact | Kodus | Sourcery |
|---|---|---|
| Licensing • | Open source — AGPL-3.0 (dual-licensed; enterprise-marked files commercial) | Proprietary |
| Self-hosting • | Yes — full stack | Enterprise only |
| Free tier | Limited free tier | Limited free tier |
| Pricing • | Free Community cloud tier (BYOK, up to 10 Kody Rules); Teams $10/dev/mo + your token costs; Enterprise custom; self-hosting free under AGPL | Free for open-source repos; Pro $12/seat/mo; Team $24/seat/mo adds analytics, 3x rate limits, daily security scans, BYO-LLM; annual saves 20%; Enterprise custom |
| Model control • | BYOK on every plan: OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Vertex, Novita, or any OpenAI-compatible endpoint (vLLM/Ollama); zero token markup | BYO-LLM available on Team tier ($24/seat); vendor models otherwise |
| Platforms • | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Forgejo | GitHub, GitLab |
| Last verified | 2026-08-11 | 2026-08-11 |
• marks a row where the two genuinely differ.
All 9 standards
✓ documented · ~ partial · ✗ not offered · ? undocumented. The arrow marks which tool documents more on that standard — it is not a quality judgement, only a coverage one.
Kodus: Repo-level analysis plus linked sibling repos; pulls business context from Jira, Linear, and Notion.
Sourcery: PR-scoped reviews; shallower context than codebase-indexing tools per our comparison.
Kodus: Plain-language Kody Rules with global-repo-directory scope; auto-imports .cursorrules, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, etc.
Sourcery: Customizable review rules supported; enforcement depth not detailed in sources we verified.
Kodus: Reviews run via CLI locally, in CI, and on PRs; distinct local-vs-PR behavior modes not detailed publicly.
Sourcery: IDE/local review surface not covered in the sources we verified.
Kodus: Pulls context from Jira, Linear, and Notion to check a PR against what the ticket asked for.
Sourcery: Ticket/requirements validation not documented.
Kodus: Kody generates rules automatically by analyzing team review history; rules and review history persist.
Sourcery: Learning from review feedback not documented.
Kodus: No documented sandbox execution or runtime validation of findings.
Sourcery: No documented sandbox validation; Team tier adds daily security scans.
Kodus: BYOK on every plan, zero token markup, published cost estimates, token-usage dashboard.
Sourcery: BYO-LLM on Team tier ($24/seat) is rare at this price; not offered on Pro.
Kodus: Provides fix suggestions in reviews; one-click commit flow not verified in the posts we checked.
Sourcery: Fix-apply flow not documented in the sources we verified.
Kodus: Token-cost and usage dashboard documented; DORA-style ROI reporting not verified in public posts.
Sourcery: Team tier adds repo analytics; ROI/DORA-level reporting not documented.
Kodus vs Sourcery: FAQ
What is the main difference between Kodus and Sourcery?
Kodus covers more of the baseline (6.5/9 vs 1.5/9), but the split matters more than the total. Kodus is fully self-hostable on a standard plan and open source under AGPL-3.0 (dual-licensed; enterprise-marked files commercial); Sourcery is self-hostable only on an enterprise contract and proprietary.
Is Kodus cheaper than Sourcery?
Kodus starts at $10/dev/mo and Sourcery at $12/seat/mo, as published by each vendor on 2026-08-11 and 2026-08-11. Compare total cost rather than seat price: Kodus bills models as byok on every plan: openai, anthropic, gemini, vertex, novita, or any openai-compatible endpoint (vllm/ollama); zero token markup, Sourcery as byo-llm available on team tier ($24/seat); vendor models otherwise.
Can Kodus and Sourcery be self-hosted?
Kodus: Yes — full stack — Free under AGPL via Docker Compose, VM, or Kubernetes/Helm; no seat minimums; optional daily heartbeat can be disabled. Sourcery: Enterprise only — Enterprise adds self-hosting; below that it is cloud-only.
Do Kodus and Sourcery support the same platforms?
Both document support for GitHub and GitLab. Kodus additionally documents Bitbucket, Azure DevOps and Forgejo; Sourcery adds nothing else.
Which one scores higher against the 9-pillar standard?
Kodus scores 6.5/9 against 1.5/9. The score is coverage of documented capability, not quality of findings — the full formula is on the methodology page.
[ Related comparisons ]
Neither is an obvious fit?
Filter all 27 tools by the constraint that actually rules candidates out.