Head to head · Verified 2026-08-11
Augment Code vs Kodus
Augment Code and Kodus both score 6.5/9 — the difference is which standards they cover. Everything below comes from each vendor's public documentation, mapped against the same 9 standards.
Augment Code
AI PR Review
Code review agent in the Cosmos platform: risk-triaged inline PR comments with full-codebase context; GitHub-native, others via CLI.
- Licence
- Proprietary
- Self-hosting
- Cloud only
- From
- $100/mo flat
Kodus
AI PR Review
Open-source AI code review built to run where the organization controls: self-hosted or cloud, models under your keys, org-wide Kody Rules.
- Licence
- Open source
- Self-hosting
- Self-hostable
- From
- $10/dev/mo
The short answer
Across the 9 standards, Augment Code is better documented on 1 (sandbox validation), Kodus on 2 (business-logic checks and cost control), and 6 come out even.
On deployment they are not interchangeable: Augment Code is cloud-only, while Kodus is fully self-hostable on a standard plan. If code cannot leave your network, that single row decides the evaluation before anything else on this page.
Kodus publishes its source under AGPL-3.0 (dual-licensed; enterprise-marked files commercial); Augment Code is proprietary. That changes what you can audit, fork, and keep running if the vendor's terms change.
Pick Augment Code if you care most about sandbox validation.
Pick Kodus if you care most about business-logic checks and cost control, the reviewer has to run inside your own infrastructure and you want to read the source before you trust it.
Side by side
| Fact | Augment Code | Kodus |
|---|---|---|
| Licensing • | Proprietary | Open source — AGPL-3.0 (dual-licensed; enterprise-marked files commercial) |
| Self-hosting • | No | Yes — full stack |
| Free tier • | Unknown | Limited free tier |
| Pricing • | Business $100/mo flat (up to 50 seats) incl. $100/mo pooled usage, plus flat 40% fee on LLM usage; Enterprise custom. Code review on all plans | Free Community cloud tier (BYOK, up to 10 Kody Rules); Teams $10/dev/mo + your token costs; Enterprise custom; self-hosting free under AGPL |
| Model control • | Choose from a vendor model list (Claude, GPT-5.x, Gemini families); no BYOK | BYOK on every plan: OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Vertex, Novita, or any OpenAI-compatible endpoint (vLLM/Ollama); zero token markup |
| Platforms • | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Forgejo |
| Last verified | 2026-08-11 | 2026-08-11 |
• marks a row where the two genuinely differ.
All 9 standards
✓ documented · ~ partial · ✗ not offered · ? undocumented. The arrow marks which tool documents more on that standard — it is not a quality judgement, only a coverage one.
Augment Code: Context Engine reads the full codebase; cross-repo context via external repos declared in AGENTS.md.
Kodus: Repo-level analysis plus linked sibling repos; pulls business context from Jira, Linear, and Notion.
Augment Code: YAML review guidelines with globs and severities; docs commit to high signal-to-noise and no style nags.
Kodus: Plain-language Kody Rules with global-repo-directory scope; auto-imports .cursorrules, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, etc.
Augment Code: GitHub PR reviews plus Auggie CLI/CI automation; no distinct local pre-commit review mode documented.
Kodus: Reviews run via CLI locally, in CI, and on PRs; distinct local-vs-PR behavior modes not detailed publicly.
Augment Code: Jira Cloud and Linear integrations plus MCP tools; ticket-vs-code validation not explicitly documented.
Kodus: Pulls context from Jira, Linear, and Notion to check a PR against what the ticket asked for.
Augment Code: Code Review Memory captures reviewer feedback and distills per-repo knowledge shared across agents.
Kodus: Kody generates rules automatically by analyzing team review history; rules and review history persist.
Augment Code: Cosmos Verifier agent exercises changes in a running environment and reports evidence-backed findings.
Kodus: No documented sandbox execution or runtime validation of findings.
Augment Code: No BYOK; model choice from a vendor list; discloses a flat 40% fee on LLM usage with a credit dashboard.
Kodus: BYOK on every plan, zero token markup, published cost estimates, token-usage dashboard.
Augment Code: 'Fix in Augment' hands findings to an agent session in IDE/CLI; no one-click commit from the PR.
Kodus: Provides fix suggestions in reviews; one-click commit flow not verified in the posts we checked.
Augment Code: Dashboard: PRs reviewed, % comments addressed, thumbs-up rate, estimated dev hours saved; no DORA metrics.
Kodus: Token-cost and usage dashboard documented; DORA-style ROI reporting not verified in public posts.
Augment Code vs Kodus: FAQ
What is the main difference between Augment Code and Kodus?
Augment Code and Kodus both score 6.5/9 — the difference is which standards they cover. Augment Code is cloud-only and proprietary; Kodus is fully self-hostable on a standard plan and open source under AGPL-3.0 (dual-licensed; enterprise-marked files commercial).
Is Augment Code cheaper than Kodus?
Augment Code starts at $100/mo flat and Kodus at $10/dev/mo, as published by each vendor on 2026-08-11 and 2026-08-11. Compare total cost rather than seat price: Augment Code bills models as choose from a vendor model list (claude, gpt-5.x, gemini families); no byok, Kodus as byok on every plan: openai, anthropic, gemini, vertex, novita, or any openai-compatible endpoint (vllm/ollama); zero token markup.
Can Augment Code and Kodus be self-hosted?
Augment Code: No — No self-hosted offering documented; Enterprise cites custom compute and multi-region deployment in Augment's cloud. Kodus: Yes — full stack — Free under AGPL via Docker Compose, VM, or Kubernetes/Helm; no seat minimums; optional daily heartbeat can be disabled.
Do Augment Code and Kodus support the same platforms?
Both document support for GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps. Augment Code additionally documents nothing else; Kodus adds Forgejo.
Which one scores higher against the 9-pillar standard?
They tie at 6.5/9. Augment Code has 9 of 9 pillars backed by public documentation, Kodus has 9.
[ Related comparisons ]
Neither is an obvious fit?
Filter all 27 tools by the constraint that actually rules candidates out.