Head to head · Verified 2026-08-11
Baz vs Kodus
Baz and Kodus both score 6.5/9 — the difference is which standards they cover. Everything below comes from each vendor's public documentation, mapped against the same 9 standards.
Baz
AI PR Review
Review platform running specialized agents (code, spec, security, merge) on GitHub, GitLab, and Azure DevOps PRs with sandbox execution.
- Licence
- Proprietary
- Self-hosting
- Enterprise only
- From
- $30/dev/mo
Kodus
AI PR Review
Open-source AI code review built to run where the organization controls: self-hosted or cloud, models under your keys, org-wide Kody Rules.
- Licence
- Open source
- Self-hosting
- Self-hostable
- From
- $10/dev/mo
The short answer
Across the 9 standards, Baz is better documented on 3 (local and PR review, sandbox validation and actionable fixes), Kodus on 4 (rule control, business-logic checks, learning from your team and cost control), and 2 come out even.
On deployment they are not interchangeable: Baz is self-hostable only on an enterprise contract, while Kodus is fully self-hostable on a standard plan. If code cannot leave your network, that single row decides the evaluation before anything else on this page.
Kodus publishes its source under AGPL-3.0 (dual-licensed; enterprise-marked files commercial); Baz is proprietary. That changes what you can audit, fork, and keep running if the vendor's terms change.
Pick Baz if you care most about local and PR review, sandbox validation and actionable fixes.
Pick Kodus if you care most about rule control, business-logic checks and learning from your team, the reviewer has to run inside your own infrastructure and you want to read the source before you trust it.
Side by side
| Fact | Baz | Kodus |
|---|---|---|
| Licensing • | Proprietary | Open source — AGPL-3.0 (dual-licensed; enterprise-marked files commercial) |
| Self-hosting • | Enterprise only | Yes — full stack |
| Free tier • | Unknown | Limited free tier |
| Pricing • | Pro $30/active dev/mo plus usage credits ($0.01/credit; agent sessions ~$1.00-$4.30; vendor suggests $20-$50/dev/mo); Enterprise custom | Free Community cloud tier (BYOK, up to 10 Kody Rules); Teams $10/dev/mo + your token costs; Enterprise custom; self-hosting free under AGPL |
| Model control • | Fixed vendor models (managed AI services incl. OpenAI); no BYOK or model choice documented | BYOK on every plan: OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Vertex, Novita, or any OpenAI-compatible endpoint (vLLM/Ollama); zero token markup |
| Platforms • | GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Forgejo |
| Last verified | 2026-08-11 | 2026-08-11 |
• marks a row where the two genuinely differ.
All 9 standards
✓ documented · ~ partial · ✗ not offered · ? undocumented. The arrow marks which tool documents more on that standard — it is not a quality judgement, only a coverage one.
Baz: Agents run against the full cloned repo in a sandbox; Datadog integration links production signals to changes.
Kodus: Repo-level analysis plus linked sibling repos; pulls business context from Jira, Linear, and Notion.
Baz: Custom reviewers via dedicated system prompts dispatched on matching diffs; quiet-default mechanics not documented.
Kodus: Plain-language Kody Rules with global-repo-directory scope; auto-imports .cursorrules, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, etc.
Baz: Terminal CLI for AI-assisted review plus Claude Code and Cursor plugins alongside PR reviews.
Kodus: Reviews run via CLI locally, in CI, and on PRs; distinct local-vs-PR behavior modes not detailed publicly.
Baz: Jira/Linear tickets enrich review context; CLI docs cite verifying requirements against linked tickets.
Kodus: Pulls context from Jira, Linear, and Notion to check a PR against what the ticket asked for.
Baz: Detects recurring feedback patterns in PR history and turns them into reusable reviewers; no per-suggestion learning.
Kodus: Kody generates rules automatically by analyzing team review history; rules and review history persist.
Baz: Sandbox runs validation commands (tests/linters) after fixes; Spec Reviewer launches the app and validates in a browser.
Kodus: No documented sandbox execution or runtime validation of findings.
Baz: Published per-session credit costs; no BYOK and no token-level cost visibility.
Kodus: BYOK on every plan, zero token markup, published cost estimates, token-usage dashboard.
Baz: Fixer sessions apply fixes in the sandbox with validation before committing; can send fixes to Cursor.
Kodus: Provides fix suggestions in reviews; one-click commit flow not verified in the posts we checked.
Baz: Merger Agent Stats dashboard (merge readiness, throughput); analytics on all plans; no DORA or cost-per-PR metrics.
Kodus: Token-cost and usage dashboard documented; DORA-style ROI reporting not verified in public posts.
Baz vs Kodus: FAQ
What is the main difference between Baz and Kodus?
Baz and Kodus both score 6.5/9 — the difference is which standards they cover. Baz is self-hostable only on an enterprise contract and proprietary; Kodus is fully self-hostable on a standard plan and open source under AGPL-3.0 (dual-licensed; enterprise-marked files commercial).
Is Baz cheaper than Kodus?
Baz starts at $30/dev/mo and Kodus at $10/dev/mo, as published by each vendor on 2026-08-11 and 2026-08-11. Compare total cost rather than seat price: Baz bills models as fixed vendor models (managed ai services incl. openai); no byok or model choice documented, Kodus as byok on every plan: openai, anthropic, gemini, vertex, novita, or any openai-compatible endpoint (vllm/ollama); zero token markup.
Can Baz and Kodus be self-hosted?
Baz: Enterprise only — Private Mode (data-plane pod in your AWS EKS) on Pro and Enterprise; full VPC deployment is an Enterprise capability. Kodus: Yes — full stack — Free under AGPL via Docker Compose, VM, or Kubernetes/Helm; no seat minimums; optional daily heartbeat can be disabled.
Do Baz and Kodus support the same platforms?
Both document support for GitHub, GitLab and Azure DevOps. Baz additionally documents nothing else; Kodus adds Bitbucket and Forgejo.
Which one scores higher against the 9-pillar standard?
They tie at 6.5/9. Baz has 9 of 9 pillars backed by public documentation, Kodus has 9.
[ Related comparisons ]
Neither is an obvious fit?
Filter all 27 tools by the constraint that actually rules candidates out.