Head to head · Verified 2026-08-11
Kodus vs Qodo
Kodus covers more of the baseline (6.5/9 vs 3.5/9), but the split matters more than the total. Everything below comes from each vendor's public documentation, mapped against the same 9 standards.
Kodus
AI PR Review
Open-source AI code review built to run where the organization controls: self-hosted or cloud, models under your keys, org-wide Kody Rules.
- Licence
- Open source
- Self-hosting
- Self-hostable
- From
- $10/dev/mo
Qodo
AI PR Review
AI platform spanning IDE assistant, CLI, and Qodo Merge PR review with test generation; enterprise on-prem and air-gapped options.
- Licence
- Proprietary
- Self-hosting
- Enterprise only
- From
- $30/mo base
The short answer
Across the 9 standards, Kodus is better documented on 6 (context depth, rule control, business-logic checks, learning from your team, cost control and actionable fixes), Qodo on 2 (local and PR review and sandbox validation), and 1 come out even.
On deployment they are not interchangeable: Kodus is fully self-hostable on a standard plan, while Qodo is self-hostable only on an enterprise contract. If code cannot leave your network, that single row decides the evaluation before anything else on this page.
Kodus publishes its source under AGPL-3.0 (dual-licensed; enterprise-marked files commercial); Qodo is proprietary. That changes what you can audit, fork, and keep running if the vendor's terms change.
Pick Kodus if you care most about context depth, rule control and business-logic checks, the reviewer has to run inside your own infrastructure and you want to read the source before you trust it.
Pick Qodo if you care most about local and PR review and sandbox validation.
Side by side
| Fact | Kodus | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Licensing • | Open source — AGPL-3.0 (dual-licensed; enterprise-marked files commercial) | Proprietary |
| Self-hosting • | Yes — full stack | Enterprise only |
| Free tier • | Limited free tier | Unknown |
| Pricing • | Free Community cloud tier (BYOK, up to 10 Kody Rules); Teams $10/dev/mo + your token costs; Enterprise custom; self-hosting free under AGPL | Pro Team $30/mo base (up to 30 users) + credit packs at $0.012/credit (~18 reviews per 2,500-credit pack, ~$1.50-1.70/review); credits expire monthly; Enterprise custom |
| Model control • | BYOK on every plan: OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Vertex, Novita, or any OpenAI-compatible endpoint (vLLM/Ollama); zero token markup | Vendor-managed models on SaaS; self-hosted model options on Enterprise air-gapped deployments |
| Platforms • | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Forgejo | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps |
| Last verified | 2026-08-11 | 2026-08-11 |
• marks a row where the two genuinely differ.
All 9 standards
✓ documented · ~ partial · ✗ not offered · ? undocumented. The arrow marks which tool documents more on that standard — it is not a quality judgement, only a coverage one.
Kodus: Repo-level analysis plus linked sibling repos; pulls business context from Jira, Linear, and Notion.
Qodo: Repo-aware RAG-based context; cross-repo and codebase-graph depth not documented.
Kodus: Plain-language Kody Rules with global-repo-directory scope; auto-imports .cursorrules, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, etc.
Qodo: Rules system with unlimited rules on the commercial platform; default-quiet posture not documented.
Kodus: Reviews run via CLI locally, in CI, and on PRs; distinct local-vs-PR behavior modes not detailed publicly.
Qodo: One subscription spans IDE assistant (Gen), CLI, and Qodo Merge PR review.
Kodus: Pulls context from Jira, Linear, and Notion to check a PR against what the ticket asked for.
Qodo: Ticket/requirements validation not documented in the sources we verified.
Kodus: Kody generates rules automatically by analyzing team review history; rules and review history persist.
Qodo: No public documentation of learning from review history found in our sources.
Kodus: No documented sandbox execution or runtime validation of findings.
Qodo: Test generation is a core platform capability; sandbox validation of review findings not documented.
Kodus: BYOK on every plan, zero token markup, published cost estimates, token-usage dashboard.
Qodo: No BYOK on standard plans (~140 credits/review at $0.012); self-hosted models on Enterprise air-gapped.
Kodus: Provides fix suggestions in reviews; one-click commit flow not verified in the posts we checked.
Qodo: One-click fix depth for the commercial product not documented in our sources.
Kodus: Token-cost and usage dashboard documented; DORA-style ROI reporting not verified in public posts.
Qodo: Qodo Merge includes dashboards; DORA/ROI reporting depth not verified.
Kodus vs Qodo: FAQ
What is the main difference between Kodus and Qodo?
Kodus covers more of the baseline (6.5/9 vs 3.5/9), but the split matters more than the total. Kodus is fully self-hostable on a standard plan and open source under AGPL-3.0 (dual-licensed; enterprise-marked files commercial); Qodo is self-hostable only on an enterprise contract and proprietary.
Is Kodus cheaper than Qodo?
Kodus starts at $10/dev/mo and Qodo at $30/mo base, as published by each vendor on 2026-08-11 and 2026-08-11. Compare total cost rather than seat price: Kodus bills models as byok on every plan: openai, anthropic, gemini, vertex, novita, or any openai-compatible endpoint (vllm/ollama); zero token markup, Qodo as vendor-managed models on saas; self-hosted model options on enterprise air-gapped deployments.
Can Kodus and Qodo be self-hosted?
Kodus: Yes — full stack — Free under AGPL via Docker Compose, VM, or Kubernetes/Helm; no seat minimums; optional daily heartbeat can be disabled. Qodo: Enterprise only — Enterprise offers single-tenant SaaS, on-prem, and air-gapped deployment at custom pricing.
Do Kodus and Qodo support the same platforms?
Both document support for GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps. Kodus additionally documents Forgejo; Qodo adds nothing else.
Which one scores higher against the 9-pillar standard?
Kodus scores 6.5/9 against 3.5/9. The score is coverage of documented capability, not quality of findings — the full formula is on the methodology page.
[ Related comparisons ]
Neither is an obvious fit?
Filter all 27 tools by the constraint that actually rules candidates out.