Head to head · Verified 2026-08-11
Graphite vs Kodus
Kodus covers more of the baseline (6.5/9 vs 1/9), but the split matters more than the total. Everything below comes from each vendor's public documentation, mapped against the same 9 standards.
Graphite
AI PR Review
Code review platform built around stacked PRs, with an AI reviewer (formerly Diamond), merge queue, and review automation for GitHub.
- Licence
- Proprietary
- Self-hosting
- Cloud only
- From
- $20/user/mo
Kodus
AI PR Review
Open-source AI code review built to run where the organization controls: self-hosted or cloud, models under your keys, org-wide Kody Rules.
- Licence
- Open source
- Self-hosting
- Self-hostable
- From
- $10/dev/mo
The short answer
Across the 9 standards, Graphite is better documented on 0 (none), Kodus on 8 (context depth, rule control, local and PR review, business-logic checks, learning from your team, sandbox validation, cost control and actionable fixes), and 1 come out even.
On deployment they are not interchangeable: Graphite is cloud-only, while Kodus is fully self-hostable on a standard plan. If code cannot leave your network, that single row decides the evaluation before anything else on this page.
Kodus publishes its source under AGPL-3.0 (dual-licensed; enterprise-marked files commercial); Graphite is proprietary. That changes what you can audit, fork, and keep running if the vendor's terms change.
Pick Graphite if its documented coverage lines up with how your team already works.
Pick Kodus if you care most about context depth, rule control and local and PR review, the reviewer has to run inside your own infrastructure and you want to read the source before you trust it.
Side by side
| Fact | Graphite | Kodus |
|---|---|---|
| Licensing • | Proprietary | Open source — AGPL-3.0 (dual-licensed; enterprise-marked files commercial) |
| Self-hosting • | No | Yes — full stack |
| Free tier | Limited free tier | Limited free tier |
| Pricing • | Hobby free (limited AI reviews); Starter $20/user/mo; Team $40/user/mo (annual) with unlimited AI reviews and merge queue; Enterprise custom | Free Community cloud tier (BYOK, up to 10 Kody Rules); Teams $10/dev/mo + your token costs; Enterprise custom; self-hosting free under AGPL |
| Model control • | No BYOK or model choice | BYOK on every plan: OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Vertex, Novita, or any OpenAI-compatible endpoint (vLLM/Ollama); zero token markup |
| Platforms • | GitHub | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Forgejo |
| Last verified | 2026-08-11 | 2026-08-11 |
• marks a row where the two genuinely differ.
All 9 standards
✓ documented · ~ partial · ✗ not offered · ? undocumented. The arrow marks which tool documents more on that standard — it is not a quality judgement, only a coverage one.
Graphite: Stack-aware review context is unique; no documented codebase index or ticket validation.
Kodus: Repo-level analysis plus linked sibling repos; pulls business context from Jira, Linear, and Notion.
Graphite: Custom review rules not documented in the sources we verified.
Kodus: Plain-language Kody Rules with global-repo-directory scope; auto-imports .cursorrules, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, etc.
Graphite: Local/IDE review surface not documented in the sources we verified.
Kodus: Reviews run via CLI locally, in CI, and on PRs; distinct local-vs-PR behavior modes not detailed publicly.
Graphite: Ticket/requirements validation not documented.
Kodus: Pulls context from Jira, Linear, and Notion to check a PR against what the ticket asked for.
Graphite: Learning from review feedback not documented.
Kodus: Kody generates rules automatically by analyzing team review history; rules and review history persist.
Graphite: No documented sandbox or test-run validation.
Kodus: No documented sandbox execution or runtime validation of findings.
Graphite: No BYOK or model choice; unlimited AI review bundled into $40/user/mo seat with no token visibility.
Kodus: BYOK on every plan, zero token markup, published cost estimates, token-usage dashboard.
Graphite: Fix-apply flow not documented in the sources we verified.
Kodus: Provides fix suggestions in reviews; one-click commit flow not verified in the posts we checked.
Graphite: Platform includes insights and review tooling; AI-specific ROI reporting not verified.
Kodus: Token-cost and usage dashboard documented; DORA-style ROI reporting not verified in public posts.
Graphite vs Kodus: FAQ
What is the main difference between Graphite and Kodus?
Kodus covers more of the baseline (6.5/9 vs 1/9), but the split matters more than the total. Graphite is cloud-only and proprietary; Kodus is fully self-hostable on a standard plan and open source under AGPL-3.0 (dual-licensed; enterprise-marked files commercial).
Is Graphite cheaper than Kodus?
Graphite starts at $20/user/mo and Kodus at $10/dev/mo, as published by each vendor on 2026-08-11 and 2026-08-11. Compare total cost rather than seat price: Graphite bills models as no byok or model choice, Kodus as byok on every plan: openai, anthropic, gemini, vertex, novita, or any openai-compatible endpoint (vllm/ollama); zero token markup.
Can Graphite and Kodus be self-hosted?
Graphite: No — Cloud-only; GitHub Enterprise Server support only on the Enterprise tier. Kodus: Yes — full stack — Free under AGPL via Docker Compose, VM, or Kubernetes/Helm; no seat minimums; optional daily heartbeat can be disabled.
Do Graphite and Kodus support the same platforms?
Both document support for GitHub. Graphite additionally documents nothing else; Kodus adds GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps and Forgejo.
Which one scores higher against the 9-pillar standard?
Kodus scores 6.5/9 against 1/9. The score is coverage of documented capability, not quality of findings — the full formula is on the methodology page.
[ Related comparisons ]
Neither is an obvious fit?
Filter all 27 tools by the constraint that actually rules candidates out.