Head to head · Verified 2026-10-26
Greptile vs Qodo
Greptile covers more of the baseline (4.5/9 vs 3.5/9), but the split matters more than the total. Everything below comes from each vendor's public documentation, mapped against the same 9 standards.
Greptile
AI PR Review
AI code reviewer that indexes the whole codebase into a graph; its TREX agent writes and runs tests for PRs in a sandbox.
- Licence
- Proprietary
- Self-hosting
- Enterprise only
- From
- $1/credit (Pro, no seat fee)
Qodo
AI PR Review
AI platform spanning IDE assistant, CLI, and Qodo Merge PR review with test generation; enterprise on-prem and air-gapped options.
- Licence
- Proprietary
- Self-hosting
- Enterprise only
- From
- $30/mo base
The short answer
Across the 9 standards, Greptile is better documented on 4 (business-logic checks, learning from your team, sandbox validation and actionable fixes), Qodo on 3 (local and PR review, cost control and ROI reporting), and 2 come out even.
Pick Greptile if you care most about business-logic checks, learning from your team and sandbox validation.
Pick Qodo if you care most about local and PR review, cost control and ROI reporting.
Side by side
| Fact | Greptile | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Licensing | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Self-hosting | Enterprise only | Enterprise only |
| Free tier • | Limited free tier | Trial only |
| Pricing • | Free Starter: 50 credits/mo (1 dev), unlimited repos; Pro: pure pay-per-credit at $1/credit, no seat fees, unlimited devs/agents, credits prepaid and shared org-wide (14-day free trial); Base review 1 credit, Plus review 3 credits, Apex review 10 credits; TREX test-run +3 credits on top of a review (charged only if a flow completes); Enterprise custom; OSS and startup programs | Pro Team $30/mo (up to 30 users), includes a 2,500-credit pack (~18 reviews/mo) at $0.012/credit; 5,000- and 20,000-credit packs also available, overage billed at the same rate up to a customer-set cap; credits expire monthly; free 14-day trial, no card required; Enterprise custom |
| Model control • | Fixed vendor models; no BYOK on standard (cloud) plans; self-hosted deployments configure their own LLM provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, or GCP Vertex AI) | Vendor-managed models on SaaS; self-hosted model options on Enterprise air-gapped deployments |
| Platforms • | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Gerrit |
| Last verified • | 2026-10-26 | 2026-10-21 |
• marks a row where the two genuinely differ.
All 9 standards
✓ documented · ~ partial · ✗ not offered · ? undocumented. The arrow marks which tool documents more on that standard — it is not a quality judgement, only a coverage one.
Greptile: Graph index of the full codebase gives deep cross-file context; ticket/business context is not a focus.
Qodo: Repo-aware RAG-based context; cross-repo and codebase-graph depth not documented.
Greptile: Plain-English custom rules on Pro; community reports on default precision/noise are mixed.
Qodo: Rules system with unlimited rules on the commercial platform; default-quiet posture not documented.
Greptile: PR-focused; MCP, Claude Code plugin, and one-click IDE fixes exist, but no local review surface documented.
Qodo: One subscription spans IDE assistant (Gen), CLI, and Qodo Merge PR review.
Greptile: Focus is code-side context rather than ticket-side; no requirements validation documented.
Qodo: Ticket/requirements validation not documented in the sources we verified.
Greptile: Learns team standards by reading your PR comments over time.
Qodo: No public documentation of learning from review history found in our sources.
Greptile: TREX writes and runs tests for each PR in a sandbox to demonstrate bugs (+3 credits on top of the review, charged only if a test flow completes).
Qodo: Test generation is a core platform capability; sandbox validation of review findings not documented.
Greptile: No BYOK or model choice on standard plans; credit billing does not expose model costs.
Qodo: No BYOK on standard plans (~140 credits/review at $0.012); self-hosted models on Enterprise air-gapped.
Greptile: One-click IDE fixes and /greploop iterative resolution with coding agents.
Qodo: One-click fix depth for the commercial product not documented in our sources.
Greptile: No review-metrics or ROI dashboards documented in the sources we verified.
Qodo: Qodo Merge includes dashboards; DORA/ROI reporting depth not verified.
Greptile vs Qodo: FAQ
What is the main difference between Greptile and Qodo?
Greptile covers more of the baseline (4.5/9 vs 3.5/9), but the split matters more than the total. Greptile is self-hostable only on an enterprise contract and proprietary; Qodo is self-hostable only on an enterprise contract and proprietary.
Is Greptile cheaper than Qodo?
Greptile starts at $1/credit (Pro, no seat fee) and Qodo at $30/mo base, as published by each vendor on 2026-10-26 and 2026-10-21. Compare total cost rather than seat price: Greptile bills models as fixed vendor models; no byok on standard (cloud) plans; self-hosted deployments configure their own llm provider (openai, anthropic, aws bedrock, azure openai, or gcp vertex ai), Qodo as vendor-managed models on saas; self-hosted model options on enterprise air-gapped deployments.
Do Greptile and Qodo support the same platforms?
Both document support for GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket. Greptile additionally documents nothing else; Qodo adds Azure DevOps and Gerrit.
Which one scores higher against the 9-pillar standard?
Greptile scores 4.5/9 against 3.5/9. The score is coverage of documented capability, not quality of findings — the full formula is on the methodology page.
[ Related comparisons ]
Neither is an obvious fit?
Filter all 27 tools by the constraint that actually rules candidates out.